By Marc Morano - CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer - June 23, 2003
(CNSNews.com) - Some Republican activists in New York City say they are becoming increasingly concerned about the influence being exercised by "liberal Democrats" on the 2004 GOP National Convention in New York.
The activists are also angry about the prominent role of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in the fundraising and planning of the convention. Bloomberg was a life-long Democratic Party fund-raiser and activist until he switched to the Republican Party to win the mayoral nomination and eventually the election in 2001.
Organizers of the Republican National Convention recently said that contrary to previous years, the convention had nearly reached all of its fundraising goals 15 months before the event. Even more notable was the fact that the New York City Host Committee for the convention had managed to secure donations from New York Democrats. The convention is scheduled be held from August 28 to September 2, 2004.
"There is an old saying, 'If you sip soup with the devil, you better use a very long spoon,' The GOP needs to watch its back," said Niger Innis of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), a conservative African American civil rights group based in New York City.
Innis warned that the GOP had better not allow Democratic money and the "liberal Democrat" Bloomberg to influence the convention.
- continued -
.........................................................................
Sweet justice and priceless irony could be ours my friends....
It would be so wonderful if the GOP machine's decision to have the convention in NY and so close to the 9/11 anniversary, in order to exploit 9/11 and War hysteria, instead starts a tsunami of questions from the American people.
Imagine if the Sheeple started to ask who was responsible within our government for the breakdowns, and why no Osama, no fireings or demotions for the FBI, CIA, NSA, NORAD, SAC, FAA....none.
What if they asked what did the President know and when did he know it on the morning of 9/11? Was the president notified (as is mandated by federal law) of the hijackings. And if he was why did he sit there and talk to kids? OR if he was not notified, why not? Who is responsible for the breakdown? Who kept that information from the President of the United States?
I'm getting carried away.
BadGimp
posted by BadGimp @ 3:41 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home